Discussion:
Study: Boycott hit Arizona convention business hard
(too old to reply)
Michelle Steiner
2010-11-18 23:34:14 UTC
Permalink
You can thank the GOP legislature and Jan Brewer for this.

<http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/azelections/articles/2010/11/18/2010
1118arizona-immigration-boycott-study.html>

Study: Boycott hit Arizona convention business hard
A boycott of Arizona in the wake of a controversial immigration law has
cost the state more than $140 million in lost meeting and convention
business, a new report released Thursday shows.

The economic impact analysis commissioned by the Center for American
Progress put hotel industry losses during the first four months after the
signing at about $45 million. Visitors would have spent an additional $96
million during their stays, said Angela Kelley, the group's vice president
for immigration and advocacy.

"This is as much I think to serve a warning to other states, particularly
those who rely on tourism and conferences and conventions, that there is an
economic impact to it," Kelley said. "We feel like this is a very modest
slice, just a piece of what the economic impact is, and we don't think that
we're overstating it or overselling it."

The study was paid for by the group, a liberal-leaning think tank, but
conducted by the respected Scottsdale-based economic firm Elliott D.
Pollack & Co.

It also says lost bookings will probably continue for more than a year,
multiplying the effect of a boycott called by immigrant-rights activists
after Republican Gov. Jan Brewer signed the state's new law in April.

Former state Sen. Alfredo Gutierrez said the goal of the boycott was to
bring the state's economy to a stop in much the same way that a boycott
punished the state 20 years ago over its refusal to honor the Rev. Martin
Luther King Jr. with a holiday.

The immigration law would require police - in enforcing other laws - to
question the immigration status of those they suspect are in the country
illegally. Opponents said that could lead to racial profiling, and said
immigration enforcement is the job of the federal government.

After U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton put the most controversial parts of
the law on hold on constitutional grounds in July, some opponents of the
measure called for the boycott to end, including U.S. Rep. Raul Grijalva of
Arizona and the grocery workers union.

An estimated 15 million visitors come to Arizona each year for vacations,
conventions and sporting events such as the Fiesta Bowl, pro golf
tournaments and baseball spring training. The state tourism office
estimates that conventions and other tourism-related activity brought in
$16.6 billion in 2009 and that 157,200 people were employed in industry.
--
Tea Party Patriots is to Patriotism as
People's Democratic Republic is to Democracy.
God's Debris
2010-11-19 07:06:16 UTC
Permalink
Since most of the jobs supported by the "lost bookings" were jobs held
by illegal's, this seems like a win to me.


On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:34:14 -0700, Michelle Steiner
Post by Michelle Steiner
You can thank the GOP legislature and Jan Brewer for this.
<http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/azelections/articles/2010/11/18/2010
1118arizona-immigration-boycott-study.html>
Study: Boycott hit Arizona convention business hard
A boycott of Arizona in the wake of a controversial immigration law has
cost the state more than $140 million in lost meeting and convention
business, a new report released Thursday shows.
The economic impact analysis commissioned by the Center for American
Progress put hotel industry losses during the first four months after the
signing at about $45 million. Visitors would have spent an additional $96
million during their stays, said Angela Kelley, the group's vice president
for immigration and advocacy.
"This is as much I think to serve a warning to other states, particularly
those who rely on tourism and conferences and conventions, that there is an
economic impact to it," Kelley said. "We feel like this is a very modest
slice, just a piece of what the economic impact is, and we don't think that
we're overstating it or overselling it."
The study was paid for by the group, a liberal-leaning think tank, but
conducted by the respected Scottsdale-based economic firm Elliott D.
Pollack & Co.
It also says lost bookings will probably continue for more than a year,
multiplying the effect of a boycott called by immigrant-rights activists
after Republican Gov. Jan Brewer signed the state's new law in April.
Former state Sen. Alfredo Gutierrez said the goal of the boycott was to
bring the state's economy to a stop in much the same way that a boycott
punished the state 20 years ago over its refusal to honor the Rev. Martin
Luther King Jr. with a holiday.
The immigration law would require police - in enforcing other laws - to
question the immigration status of those they suspect are in the country
illegally. Opponents said that could lead to racial profiling, and said
immigration enforcement is the job of the federal government.
After U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton put the most controversial parts of
the law on hold on constitutional grounds in July, some opponents of the
measure called for the boycott to end, including U.S. Rep. Raul Grijalva of
Arizona and the grocery workers union.
An estimated 15 million visitors come to Arizona each year for vacations,
conventions and sporting events such as the Fiesta Bowl, pro golf
tournaments and baseball spring training. The state tourism office
estimates that conventions and other tourism-related activity brought in
$16.6 billion in 2009 and that 157,200 people were employed in industry.
Arizona Willie
2010-11-20 15:22:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by God's Debris
Since most of the jobs supported by the "lost bookings" were jobs held
by illegal's, this seems like a win to me.
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:34:14 -0700, Michelle Steiner
Post by Michelle Steiner
You can thank the GOP legislature and Jan Brewer for this.
<http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/azelections/articles/2010/11/18
/2010 1118arizona-immigration-boycott-study.html>
Study: Boycott hit Arizona convention business hard
A boycott of Arizona in the wake of a controversial immigration law
has cost the state more than $140 million in lost meeting and
convention business, a new report released Thursday shows.
The economic impact analysis commissioned by the Center for American
Progress put hotel industry losses during the first four months after
the signing at about $45 million. Visitors would have spent an
additional $96 million during their stays, said Angela Kelley, the
group's vice president for immigration and advocacy.
"This is as much I think to serve a warning to other states,
particularly those who rely on tourism and conferences and
conventions, that there is an economic impact to it," Kelley said. "We
feel like this is a very modest slice, just a piece of what the
economic impact is, and we don't think that we're overstating it or
overselling it."
The study was paid for by the group, a liberal-leaning think tank, but
conducted by the respected Scottsdale-based economic firm Elliott D.
Pollack & Co.
It also says lost bookings will probably continue for more than a
year, multiplying the effect of a boycott called by immigrant-rights
activists after Republican Gov. Jan Brewer signed the state's new law
in April.
Former state Sen. Alfredo Gutierrez said the goal of the boycott was
to bring the state's economy to a stop in much the same way that a
boycott punished the state 20 years ago over its refusal to honor the
Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. with a holiday.
The immigration law would require police - in enforcing other laws -
to question the immigration status of those they suspect are in the
country illegally. Opponents said that could lead to racial profiling,
and said immigration enforcement is the job of the federal government.
After U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton put the most controversial
parts of the law on hold on constitutional grounds in July, some
opponents of the measure called for the boycott to end, including U.S.
Rep. Raul Grijalva of Arizona and the grocery workers union.
An estimated 15 million visitors come to Arizona each year for
vacations, conventions and sporting events such as the Fiesta Bowl,
pro golf tournaments and baseball spring training. The state tourism
office estimates that conventions and other tourism-related activity
brought in $16.6 billion in 2009 and that 157,200 people were employed
in industry.
==============
You gotta remember this report was cooked up by an illegal loving
organization.

Their " facts " are extremely suspect.

If, in fact, that much business had been lost all the hotels would be in
bankruptcy.

And, what business was lost cost illegals their jobs ... so as you say
... that was a good thing .... bring on some more boycotts.

The only people that were hurt by the boycotts were illegals working in
the hospitality industry and the business owners who hired the illegals.

How can we get more states and companies to boycott Arizona?
Michelle Steiner
2010-11-20 16:25:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Arizona Willie
The only people that were hurt by the boycotts were illegals working in
the hospitality industry and the business owners who hired the illegals.
And the state treasury from lost sales and hotel taxes. Oh, and don't
forget all those businesses in the vicinity of those hotels that would have
made sales if it had not been for the boycott. Oh, and then there are
those businesses that sell to hotels and restaurants that aren't selling as
much because the hotels and restaurants don't need to buy so much because
of the boycotts.
--
Tea Party Patriots is to Patriotism as
People's Democratic Republic is to Democracy.
God's Debris
2010-11-22 01:03:00 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:25:29 -0700, Michelle Steiner
Post by Michelle Steiner
Post by Arizona Willie
The only people that were hurt by the boycotts were illegals working in
the hospitality industry and the business owners who hired the illegals.
And the state treasury from lost sales and hotel taxes. Oh, and don't
forget all those businesses in the vicinity of those hotels that would have
made sales if it had not been for the boycott. Oh, and then there are
those businesses that sell to hotels and restaurants that aren't selling as
much because the hotels and restaurants don't need to buy so much because
of the boycotts.
Why don't we just empty the prisons. With all the crooks out on the
street and all the new thefts, sales of new stuff will boom and then
there will be more taxes collected. What with all the mayhem that
will ensue the hospitals will get busier too and that's got to be good
for the economy. Why not just give every prisoner a hammer on his way
out so they can smash cars at random and that will also generate a
whole lot of new body shop and windshield repair work. Plus the taxes
collected on those sales. You've SOLVED the AZ economic crisis!!!
Demsareslugs
2010-11-25 01:17:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michelle Steiner
Post by Arizona Willie
The only people that were hurt by the boycotts were illegals working in
the hospitality industry and the business owners who hired the illegals.
And the state treasury from lost sales and hotel taxes. Oh, and don't
forget all those businesses in the vicinity of those hotels that would have
made sales if it had not been for the boycott. Oh, and then there are
those businesses that sell to hotels and restaurants that aren't selling as
much because the hotels and restaurants don't need to buy so much because
of the boycotts.
Big fucking deal. The Mexicans steal more from Arizona than we could
lose from a boycott. Do you think all those people freezing their asses
off back east are going to boycott AZ because we don't like illegal
diseased Mexicans around raping, robbing, killing and getting free tax
benefits? You like illegals because they can't complain when you molest
them.

Demsareslugs
2010-11-25 01:15:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Arizona Willie
Post by God's Debris
Since most of the jobs supported by the "lost bookings" were jobs held
by illegal's, this seems like a win to me.
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:34:14 -0700, Michelle Steiner
Post by Michelle Steiner
You can thank the GOP legislature and Jan Brewer for this.
<http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/azelections/articles/2010/11/18
/2010 1118arizona-immigration-boycott-study.html>
Study: Boycott hit Arizona convention business hard
A boycott of Arizona in the wake of a controversial immigration law
has cost the state more than $140 million in lost meeting and
convention business, a new report released Thursday shows.
The economic impact analysis commissioned by the Center for American
Progress put hotel industry losses during the first four months after
the signing at about $45 million. Visitors would have spent an
additional $96 million during their stays, said Angela Kelley, the
group's vice president for immigration and advocacy.
"This is as much I think to serve a warning to other states,
particularly those who rely on tourism and conferences and
conventions, that there is an economic impact to it," Kelley said. "We
feel like this is a very modest slice, just a piece of what the
economic impact is, and we don't think that we're overstating it or
overselling it."
The study was paid for by the group, a liberal-leaning think tank, but
conducted by the respected Scottsdale-based economic firm Elliott D.
Pollack& Co.
It also says lost bookings will probably continue for more than a
year, multiplying the effect of a boycott called by immigrant-rights
activists after Republican Gov. Jan Brewer signed the state's new law
in April.
Former state Sen. Alfredo Gutierrez said the goal of the boycott was
to bring the state's economy to a stop in much the same way that a
boycott punished the state 20 years ago over its refusal to honor the
Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. with a holiday.
The immigration law would require police - in enforcing other laws -
to question the immigration status of those they suspect are in the
country illegally. Opponents said that could lead to racial profiling,
and said immigration enforcement is the job of the federal government.
After U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton put the most controversial
parts of the law on hold on constitutional grounds in July, some
opponents of the measure called for the boycott to end, including U.S.
Rep. Raul Grijalva of Arizona and the grocery workers union.
An estimated 15 million visitors come to Arizona each year for
vacations, conventions and sporting events such as the Fiesta Bowl,
pro golf tournaments and baseball spring training. The state tourism
office estimates that conventions and other tourism-related activity
brought in $16.6 billion in 2009 and that 157,200 people were employed
in industry.
==============
You gotta remember this report was cooked up by an illegal loving
organization.
Their " facts " are extremely suspect.
If, in fact, that much business had been lost all the hotels would be in
bankruptcy.
And, what business was lost cost illegals their jobs ... so as you say
... that was a good thing .... bring on some more boycotts.
The only people that were hurt by the boycotts were illegals working in
the hospitality industry and the business owners who hired the illegals.
How can we get more states and companies to boycott Arizona?
Send pictures of Sgt. Steiner at Sky Harbor kissing arriving tourists.
Loading...